RONULO Vs. People
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Church off San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. But not, on the day of your own relationship, the fresh heading officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, would not solemnize the wedding upon learning that pair unsuccessful to help you safer a married relationship licenses. As the a recourse, Joey, who was after that dressed in barong tagalong, and you will Claire, clad inside the a married relationship dress, with their moms and dads, sponsors and traffic, went on to the Separate Church away from Filipino Christians, labeled as new Aglipayan Chapel. It asked this new petitioner, an enthusiastic Aglipayan priest, to do a service to which the latter agreed despite having come informed from the couples they had zero marriage certification.
The latest petitioner wishing their choir and you may arranged a size to the partners on a single day. The guy held the latest ceremony in the visibility of one’s groom, the newest fiance, its moms and dads, the principal and you can secondary sponsors additionally the rest of its enjoy website visitors.
The prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and Mary Anne Yere, testified to your incidents of one’s service. Joseph try the brand new veil mentor while you are Mary Anne are the newest cord recruit on the matrimony. Mary Anne affirmed one to she noticed this new bride to be walk-down the latest section. She and watched the happy couple exchange its wedding rings, hug both, and you can signal a document. She read the brand new petitioner instructing the principal sponsors to indication the wedding bargain. Thereafter, it decided to go to the latest lobby, had supper and got images. She watched the fresh petitioner truth be told there. She together with understood the marriage invitation provided to the lady because of the Joey.
Fl Umadac, the mother out-of Joey, affirmed you to she heard the couple state for the ceremony that it take each other since husband and wife. Mariano Roentgen. Nalupta Jr. where she got a certification that zero matrimony permit are given to the partners.
The brand new petitioner, when you’re admitting that he presented a service, denied one his act away from true blessing the happy couple is actually tantamount to help you an excellent solemnization of one’s relationships because contemplated legally.
ISSUE: Obtained the https://datingranking.net/local-hookup/pueblo/ petitioner was guilty of breaking Post 352 of one’s Modified Penal Code (RPC) to possess presumably creating an illegal marriage ceremony.
Days after the marriage, she went to the fresh municipal local civil registrar regarding San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte which have Atty
RATIO: Petitioner presented an unlawful wedding party. The fresh new crime once the taken to inside Ways 352 of your own RPC is the efficiency away from ily Password hence checks out:
(3) A wedding ceremony which takes set towards appearance of new contracting functions until the solemnizing administrator in addition to their personal declaration one they take one another since husband and wife on exposure out-of for around a couple of witnesses of legal decades.
Ways. six. Zero given function otherwise religious rite with the solemnization of the marriage will become necessary. They is called for, however, with the employing parties to seem actually up until the solemnizing officer and you can state regarding exposure out of for around two witnesses regarding court years that they capture each other because the husband and you will spouse. So it statement is going to be included in the marriage certification and therefore will feel signed because of the hiring events and their witnesses and you will attested from the solemnizing officer.
The fresh Finest Courtroom said one to what produced new petitioner’s operate a beneficial wedding ceremony and not only true blessing is actually you to definitely whenever you are there’s absolutely no prescribed form otherwise religious rite, all of that was expected is “on contracting functions to appear truly before solemnizing officer and you will state regarding the exposure off for around a couple witnesses out-of courtroom many years that they grab both since the spouse and girlfriend.”
From what first requirements, brand new petitioner admitted that the people searched before him which fact is testified so you’re able to by witnesses. With the 2nd requisite, we discover one to, against the petitioner’s allegation, the new prosecution has proven, from testimony from witnesses, your contracting people privately proclaimed which they simply take both because the wife and husband. Therefore, it is clear one to petitioner held a married relationship ceremony and never just blessing.
0 Comments